خبر من ياهو فرنسا: قرآن مخطوط The blood of Saddam Hussein's Iraq annoying Rev. Lucien beautiful. Kayf. Nineveh
Koran Manuscript blood of Saddam Hussein's Iraq bother
dear readers
between short news that we find every day on Yahoo France, I found this news Quoted in L'Express: Fr, which Sotorgomh of the French language and comment upon, as he deserves because of its importance.
As this story says:
Koran written (manuscript) the blood of Saddam Hussein's annoying Iraq. And continued with the author of the story, saying: This manuscript of the Bible the blood of Saddam Hussein has remained hidden during the seven years. Then he continues: Will be on the officials were to present to the public M Itlvoh? There is a very special Relique ammunition hidden inside a vault belonging to the mosque is located east of Baghdad, since the end of the nineties, Saddam Hussein has worked on that line is a copy of the Quran with 27 liters of blood, Gradually taken from him within two years. This is the Bible, hidden since the fall of Baghdad in 2003, and the book was disastrous, it annoys the Iraqi leadership at the present time, says newspaper The Guardian daily. Then ask the owner of the news, saying: Do I have to destroy "the Koran blood" This, as happened with the huge statue of Saddam Hussein, who smashed the American soldiers in April 2003, or should Keep it "as a sign of the brutality of Saddam," he asked Ali al-Moussawi, spokesman for Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki? Then ends by saying his words: In every country, palaces, statues and monuments Connect to recall two decades of dictatorship that Iraqis are trying at the present time to be put behind them. This has met with the Guardian Calligrapher Abbas Shaker al-Baghdadi, Judy, who Today is a resident in the United States, who said he spent two years on the line "Koran blood," that this was a painful era for me and I want to forget. (Finished translation of the news).
Comment:
starting I would love to start my comment your words say:
Whatever my own feelings towards a person martyr Saddam Hussein, but that I wrote this comment, Yanbu Maintained the principled and moral person who was not still the legitimate head of State, who was assassinated by the evil of America, and not the other, the support of European and non-European and clear, and the silence of Arab suspicious. Is not to say America murdered Saddam Hussein of cowardice and villainy, because the Iraqis who have tried the martyr Saddam Hussein and carried out its death sentence, they were not more people implementing the process of treachery, motivated Hatred they hold for this man and Arabism, which was carrying at the time the tide was religious, especially the tide of sectarian Khomeini, who converted to D-sectarian, has escalated so much, For reasons that are not now in question.
and say it now:
that I do not see in person the attack on the martyr Saddam Hussein's attack on Iraq as a nation only, I do not see The attack on the U.S. and internationally and the party that had belonged to him the martyr Saddam Hussein's Arab Baath Socialist Party, according to, but I see where an attack on every citizen of Iraq, including The writer of these lines that his words of wanting to shed light on some of the book and the West Ialamiyetm misguided villains,
this if not to say that the assassination of Saddam Hussein, was already Assassination of the State of Iraq legitimate, and it was an attack on all Arabs and all Muslims, but was not an attack on all human beings, whatever their religion and their beliefs and social affiliation, Because the attack came by the will of evil barbarism hit everything that is consistent and authentic and Sam in humans of human values \u200b\u200band function of human beings out of the chaos of the decaying law of the jungle state of humanitarian ethics Common among humans, this morality that is the foundation in the humanization of man.
It is worth mentioning here is that I have already said more than once in my writings on the site Book of Iraqis for freedom that the Americans were interested in the elimination of Arabism first before spending the Islamist trend, for example, whether Sunni or Shiite, Arab Identity is That were frightened and torn by, as became scare and Iwrgahm all mentioned as the identity that he was carrying an initial stubborn man named "Saddam Hussein", as was the scare and Iwrgahm each of the Strongly exhibit this identity, any Baathists who have received the bulk of the targeting and filtering before, during and after the occupation wicked.
this I was very pleased when I found Yesterday, the site of Iraqi Writers talk about this fact literary orderly and reasonable person of peace by Mr. Chandler.
It is thus here we find that when you hate black He called from the press Almottagni on the Koran manuscript blood of the martyr Saddam Hussein, "the Koran blood," an instigator of that gain this Quran have won the statue of Saddam from the fate of, any destruction, through تساؤل خبيث يضعه كاتب الخبر على ل
Monday, December 27, 2010
Monday, December 20, 2010
Is It Ok To Give The Diaper Punishment
Rapporto al comitato centrale
Saturday, December 18, in Bologna, we held the first national assembly of "U.S. and other: a new political entity that governs the transition." The promoters were for the Common Good (PBC), Motion Degrowth Felice (MDF), Turin Provincial Network of Movements and Citizenship Lists ( RPMLC) , Zero Movement Massimo Fini and natural alternative.
There were many "observers", representatives of movements and associations as partners in place and the process unit, the Group of the Cinque Terre in the Democratic Revolution, by association Campoantimperialista Eucrazia, accompanied from many individual membership.
The 104 present, gathered in Bologna despite the considerable logistical difficulties in-season, were divided into four working groups, which discussed about how and where to amend the policy document for submission, and which practical steps taken in the next year to strengthen the unified process, develop a shared diagnosis and therapy on the state of our country, and to raise awareness throughout the general public. It was decided to hold thematic seminars on the great issues of our time in which to collect and enhance the contributions of skilled people, and arrive at a shared vision, also a program, on the various fields in which our actions will unfold. The topics will include: operation of the new political and internal democracy, the transition to multipolarity dall'unilateralismo, the question of national sovereignty, the concept of contraction and that of the transition, the welfare state to defend and revive, the harmful effects of media manipulation, the deplorable state of school education in general.
After the plenary session, held in the afternoon, it was decided to impose a provisional operational secretariat, made up of representatives from the promoters, among which our Fabrizio Tringali , and the appointment of a spokesman in the person of Maurizio Pallante. It was established that it is for the regional groups organize seminars, and this must be convened as soon as the joint meetings of those members, and will need to map (google maps) of local Interested in working with us.
far institutional facts. Now proceed with the cabaret.
I said that the House has dealt with formal and organizational issues, but from 17 to 18: first, around the three and a half, there has been a fact of which we would gladly done without.
In this town, a senior lawyer advocates the inclusion of a strong reminder of the Constitution in the policy document of UED, Fernando Rossi is said to evoke favorable resistance, "which we have liberated from the Germans, but it is unclear why not the Americans. " Badiale Marino took the floor to suggest to postpone the discussion of possible amendments to the seminars, meetings or at a very special and later, in interpreting the will of the vast majority of the assembly. Giulietto Church argues that it is in favor of postponing the discussion of the amendments, but it is appropriate to include a reference to the Constitution. At this point, Massimo Fini. The writer says disappointed with how things are progressing. Mankind, all, to behave like doppelgänger the other parties. Zero makes clear that movement does not move under the republican constitution (sic), and declares that he will meet with "her" to take stock of the situation. After leaving the classroom, he said for political reasons and not contingent, accompanied by a warm applause.
The experience of Bologna is positive, because he made it clear three things;
a) the majority of reality "anti-system" that have adhered to UED want to create something new, large and cohesive. There is a strong demand for unity and novelty.
b) the minority who do not want to give life to a political unit or organization belongs already structured, proud of their independence, or small local associations with no strategic vision.
- as soon as you leave the discussions around the shape to deal with those values \u200b\u200band content, open gaps, of which the Finian's just the most visible. We need a debate patient, reasoned and comprehensive, so you can focus all on what unites us, rather than on what divides us.
Side note: the merit of my proposals.
Within my team, I forward the following three proposals.
The first is to weave a network of contacts and meetings with allied political forces, but in other countries, especially (I think) of the Latin American region. Become partners of international actors, as equals, we will give strength and credibility. The loved the idea, we'll talk.
The second covers the topics of the seminars: I have proposed launching a workshop on the unmasking of buffaloes. The buffaloes, even the super-buffaloes, are the true figure of our time. It is true that the pension cuts are inevitable? Slobodan Milosevic was a bloody dictator or a president honest and progressive? They are right who say that AIDS is a scam? Things like this. Liked the idea, I promised Stao cjhe ic is a special place in the seminar on the media and about comunicazione.A buffalo, I try to unmask one, big, that affects us all, next on this site. You'll see.
The third is a model of organization of new political entity. I propose to implement a proper legal flow from the Swiss Confederation. The Swiss model provides for conducting an executive (7 members) expression of the national assembly of all the Swiss Federal Assembly and of all the cantons. I think, in broad terms, the model best suited to meet the needs of both the unitary process, and the various promoters of this process: the right balance between the reasons of autonomy membership and the unity of all those who wish to change the present state of things. The idea is liked, but it is to be finalized.
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Saturday, December 11, 2010
Brazilian Wax Feminist
Un esempio per il mondo
A poster war
Domenico Losurdo
aired live on all major television networks in the world, the speech made by Chairman of the Nobel Committee at the time of the transfer the peace prize to Liu Xiaobo is presented as a manifesto of war. The fundamental concept is unclear how ramshackle and Manichaean: democracies have never waged war and were not in war with each other, and thus to triumph once and for all the cause of peace must spread democracy on a global scale. One who speaks thus ignores history, ignores for example the war between 1812 and 1815 spread between Britain and the USA. Two countries are "democratic" and most are both part of the "pragmatic" and "peaceful" Anglo-Saxon stock. Yet such is the fury of a war that Thomas Jefferson compared to "Satan" and the British government to declare that fact even that Britain and the U.S. are engaged in an "eternal war" (eternal war), which is to end with the 'murder (extermination) of either side. "
aired live on all major television networks in the world, the speech made by Chairman of the Nobel Committee at the time of the transfer the peace prize to Liu Xiaobo is presented as a manifesto of war. The fundamental concept is unclear how ramshackle and Manichaean: democracies have never waged war and were not in war with each other, and thus to triumph once and for all the cause of peace must spread democracy on a global scale. One who speaks thus ignores history, ignores for example the war between 1812 and 1815 spread between Britain and the USA. Two countries are "democratic" and most are both part of the "pragmatic" and "peaceful" Anglo-Saxon stock. Yet such is the fury of a war that Thomas Jefferson compared to "Satan" and the British government to declare that fact even that Britain and the U.S. are engaged in an "eternal war" (eternal war), which is to end with the 'murder (extermination) of either side. "
identifying the cause of peace and the cause of democracy, the chairman of the Nobel Committee beautifies the history of colonialism, which has often seen the countries 'democratic' to promote the expansion, with recourse to war, violence and even more brutal genocidal practices. But it is not only the past. With his speech, the chairman of the Nobel Committee has standing to rear the first Gulf War, the war against Yugoslavia, the second Gulf War, all done by great "democracy" and in the name of 'democracy'.
Now, the biggest obstacle to the universal spread of democracy is represented by China, therefore, is both the most dangerous outbreak of war to fight with every means for a "regime change" in Beijing is a noble to the service of peace: this is the message that was sent to Oslo and bombed around the world, and has been transmitted while the fleet bombarded the U.S. military continues to "practice" not far from the coast of China.
At the time, a famous philosopher "democratic" and Western, John Stuart Mill, has defended the Opium Wars against China as a contribution to the cause of freedom, "freedom" buyer "before that" the manufacturer or vendor. " E 'in the wake of this unfortunate colonial tradition that the warlords are located in Oslo. The manifesto launched by the chairman of the Nobel Committee should sound like an alarm bell for those who really care about the cause of peace.
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
Why Do Women Like Big Noses
Michel Collon, il deficiente
The first and most deadly was the Iran-Iraq (ah, here) . Unleashed by Saddam Hussein that was believed to refer the mission trustee to liquidate the new Iranian regime (false: since the beginning Khomeini demanded regime change in Baghdad, which seguro hundreds of armed provocation on the border. The climax was reached when Shiite terrorists attempted to assassinate Minister Tareq Aziz, and when the then Iranian President Bani Sadr, the media announced the intention to invade Iraq), while it was the Machiavellian maneuver to exhaust the two OPEC members enough strong enough to counter the Saudi influence " moderate" (ie, submissive to the United States) in the organization of petroleum (this is true, but to a certain point: Kissinger is both Ytzak Hamir, both Sharon voted for the victory of Iran, who received aiutim by Israel and the U.S. military during the war.) . Saddam Hussein, the CIA helped to establish his regime by providing lists of communist militants who had participated with him in the overthrow of the monarchy in 1958, and that eliminated carefully (road false: Saddam did not participate directly in the revolution '58, but to that of '68, directed against the regime's pro-Western Aref. As for the communists killed on the orders of the CIA, is an old story without proof. The facts tell us that the Iraq PC, along with the Kurdish Democratic Party and the Baath Party, ruled Iraq until 1979) and thought , fatal error analysis, that he was a friend of the United States . However, the empire has no friends, only vassals or serfs.
The second is permanent. And 'the ongoing economic embargo, the contents s'inasprisce in the resolutions of the Security Council but, if it has complicated the course of the country, has not produced the expected depletion or the clashes that were supposed to be the consequence, and not dismissed Western companies eager for new markets (perhaps because it is not an embargo so terrible? Embargoes true, as the one against Cuba, such as that against Iraq, according Collon friend of the Americans, causing the ruin of the economies affected. The author does not know who is speaking.)
Iran is organizing a neighborhood regional trust and cooperation, aiming to become a new pole of the multipolar world emerging before our eyes.
This is a real gem. In one fell swoop, the author recounts one by one, all the clichés of anti-imperialist circles (?) Europe on the Middle East, popular since the days of Khomeini and is still raging. It requires careful exegesis. But the real question is, Iran is paying for what he writes, or is so stupid to do it for free?
Iran s'emancipa (at the expense of neighbors, ed)
Michel Collon
since the Islamic revolution of 1979, ricordamolo, (right: we recite the mantra) destroyed the main bastion of imperialism in the Middle East, the Tehran regime haunts the nights of Western leaders. (the moron part in Five: the main bastion of imperialism has always been Israel and the Islamic Revolution haunts the dreams of some Americans, as we shall see)
The nightmare (bum!) had already established in Washington, the only organizer (false: was involved, the United Kingdom) the coup of 1953 that brought to power the brutal dictatorship of the Shah, and never admitted that the U.S. embassy in a foreign country could be occupied, (and how! The U.S. has allowed the sacrifice of its citizens on September 11, 2000, and the entire Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor. They are called investment, Michel) its staff kidnapped (No violence) and its stock is subjected to a thorough analysis (yes of course, in the manner of Wikileaks) that at any moment, the terrible vengeance of an attack and then a bloody aggression and invasion to happen settle accounts with a regime he had insulted for daring to raise his hand against the servants of the Empire. (attacks on embassies have never prevented the restoration of diplomatic relations profitable, as happened between Iran and Russia 800)
Yet after 30 years, revenge is unquenchable. (Bum, bum!)
All indirect attacks, military or civilian, have failed. (SUCH ATTACKS, DAMN! When the West has never lifted a finger against the Islamic republic?)
The nightmare (bum!) had already established in Washington, the only organizer (false: was involved, the United Kingdom) the coup of 1953 that brought to power the brutal dictatorship of the Shah, and never admitted that the U.S. embassy in a foreign country could be occupied, (and how! The U.S. has allowed the sacrifice of its citizens on September 11, 2000, and the entire Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor. They are called investment, Michel) its staff kidnapped (No violence) and its stock is subjected to a thorough analysis (yes of course, in the manner of Wikileaks) that at any moment, the terrible vengeance of an attack and then a bloody aggression and invasion to happen settle accounts with a regime he had insulted for daring to raise his hand against the servants of the Empire. (attacks on embassies have never prevented the restoration of diplomatic relations profitable, as happened between Iran and Russia 800)
Yet after 30 years, revenge is unquenchable. (Bum, bum!)
All indirect attacks, military or civilian, have failed. (SUCH ATTACKS, DAMN! When the West has never lifted a finger against the Islamic republic?)
The first and most deadly was the Iran-Iraq (ah, here) . Unleashed by Saddam Hussein that was believed to refer the mission trustee to liquidate the new Iranian regime (false: since the beginning Khomeini demanded regime change in Baghdad, which seguro hundreds of armed provocation on the border. The climax was reached when Shiite terrorists attempted to assassinate Minister Tareq Aziz, and when the then Iranian President Bani Sadr, the media announced the intention to invade Iraq), while it was the Machiavellian maneuver to exhaust the two OPEC members enough strong enough to counter the Saudi influence " moderate" (ie, submissive to the United States) in the organization of petroleum (this is true, but to a certain point: Kissinger is both Ytzak Hamir, both Sharon voted for the victory of Iran, who received aiutim by Israel and the U.S. military during the war.) . Saddam Hussein, the CIA helped to establish his regime by providing lists of communist militants who had participated with him in the overthrow of the monarchy in 1958, and that eliminated carefully (road false: Saddam did not participate directly in the revolution '58, but to that of '68, directed against the regime's pro-Western Aref. As for the communists killed on the orders of the CIA, is an old story without proof. The facts tell us that the Iraq PC, along with the Kurdish Democratic Party and the Baath Party, ruled Iraq until 1979) and thought , fatal error analysis, that he was a friend of the United States . However, the empire has no friends, only vassals or serfs.
The second is permanent. And 'the ongoing economic embargo, the contents s'inasprisce in the resolutions of the Security Council but, if it has complicated the course of the country, has not produced the expected depletion or the clashes that were supposed to be the consequence, and not dismissed Western companies eager for new markets (perhaps because it is not an embargo so terrible? Embargoes true, as the one against Cuba, such as that against Iraq, according Collon friend of the Americans, causing the ruin of the economies affected. The author does not know who is speaking.)
.
The third is the policy of encirclement continued since 2001, as part of the "war against terrorism . Iran, remember, was posted by GW Bush in the axis of evil (oh, how evil it does!) , and was assisted to the east (Afghanistan) and west (Iraq) from ' U.S. Army in campaigns supported by large numbers of mercenaries paid for by the Pentagon, and assisted by the various contingents of the NATO allies, lined up like Australia or (or enthusiastic as Iran. The They also know the chickens that employment of the two countries would not have been possible without the help of Iran, implemented with the Shiite parties in Iraq, in Afghanistan with support for Karzai's ethnic Hazara friend) . But the United States can not use the two outside bases to attack Iran, because they do not know the internal situation (you fool) . Bogged down in Afghanistan, they are forced to accept the establishment of a government in Iraq, given its constitution and its parliamentary support, it is certainly not ready to attack Iran next (and why should it? Trai relations the two countries are flourishing, in contrast to what happened under the Taliban) .
The fourth is that internal interference has taken many forms: corruption of Rafsanjani, the test of the color revolution in the spring of 2010, support for the Baluch dissent ... but have not produced the desired results.
There was only a pretext for the Iranian nuclear weapons wield, without interruption since 2007, the threat of direct military attack (oh no dear Collon, you and your fellow foretold the attack, always imminent, at least from 2004, a move useful to distract the attention of the real war, one in Iraq) . That the performer had to be ol'esercito Zionist ol'esercito U.S., is in itself a minor matter: the Israeli bombers can not fly without the American GPS ( mostly Brezinsky, advisor to Obama, has threatened to slash Israeli fighters, if they got up in the air to strike Iran. This is the procedure against the enemy countries?) . This has not stopped Iran from pursuing its nuclear policy, which culminated in the commissioning, in August, the first Bushehr nuclear power plant supplied by Russia. Iran has thus
resisted well (and I believe you. I think we all want a treatment similar to that received by the mullahs in recent years, caresses and sweet) .
But the novelty is that now is past the stage of a serious counter-attack.
His first area of \u200b\u200bintervention is the Middle East, where its official support to Lebanese Hezbollah and Palestinian Hamas to seriously diminish the freedom of military action of Israel, taking advantage of the imperial patronage and impunity that has assured He was accustomed to intervene militarily in 1948 and at every opportunity on its neighbors (because now he has lost, right. I go to explain to those in Gaza or Bint Jbeil) .
This field is now being greatly expanded. Axis of evil or not, Iran has stepped up diplomatic and economic relations with countries that are themselves in resistance to interference of the United States (and often simultaneously Zionist) including: Venezuela, Bolivia, Belarus, Cuba has also developed relations with the African continent, as evidenced by the recent visit of Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs in Burkina Faso, where he was warmly greeted by the most faithful agent Françafrique: Blaise Compaoré (I did not understand: if Iran develops a relationship with puppet of imperialism, where is the resistance?) . But most
important is the recent establishment of a regional sphere of influence.
The third is the policy of encirclement continued since 2001, as part of the "war against terrorism . Iran, remember, was posted by GW Bush in the axis of evil (oh, how evil it does!) , and was assisted to the east (Afghanistan) and west (Iraq) from ' U.S. Army in campaigns supported by large numbers of mercenaries paid for by the Pentagon, and assisted by the various contingents of the NATO allies, lined up like Australia or (or enthusiastic as Iran. The They also know the chickens that employment of the two countries would not have been possible without the help of Iran, implemented with the Shiite parties in Iraq, in Afghanistan with support for Karzai's ethnic Hazara friend) . But the United States can not use the two outside bases to attack Iran, because they do not know the internal situation (you fool) . Bogged down in Afghanistan, they are forced to accept the establishment of a government in Iraq, given its constitution and its parliamentary support, it is certainly not ready to attack Iran next (and why should it? Trai relations the two countries are flourishing, in contrast to what happened under the Taliban) .
The fourth is that internal interference has taken many forms: corruption of Rafsanjani, the test of the color revolution in the spring of 2010, support for the Baluch dissent ... but have not produced the desired results.
There was only a pretext for the Iranian nuclear weapons wield, without interruption since 2007, the threat of direct military attack (oh no dear Collon, you and your fellow foretold the attack, always imminent, at least from 2004, a move useful to distract the attention of the real war, one in Iraq) . That the performer had to be ol'esercito Zionist ol'esercito U.S., is in itself a minor matter: the Israeli bombers can not fly without the American GPS ( mostly Brezinsky, advisor to Obama, has threatened to slash Israeli fighters, if they got up in the air to strike Iran. This is the procedure against the enemy countries?) . This has not stopped Iran from pursuing its nuclear policy, which culminated in the commissioning, in August, the first Bushehr nuclear power plant supplied by Russia. Iran has thus
resisted well (and I believe you. I think we all want a treatment similar to that received by the mullahs in recent years, caresses and sweet) .
But the novelty is that now is past the stage of a serious counter-attack.
His first area of \u200b\u200bintervention is the Middle East, where its official support to Lebanese Hezbollah and Palestinian Hamas to seriously diminish the freedom of military action of Israel, taking advantage of the imperial patronage and impunity that has assured He was accustomed to intervene militarily in 1948 and at every opportunity on its neighbors (because now he has lost, right. I go to explain to those in Gaza or Bint Jbeil) .
This field is now being greatly expanded. Axis of evil or not, Iran has stepped up diplomatic and economic relations with countries that are themselves in resistance to interference of the United States (and often simultaneously Zionist) including: Venezuela, Bolivia, Belarus, Cuba has also developed relations with the African continent, as evidenced by the recent visit of Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs in Burkina Faso, where he was warmly greeted by the most faithful agent Françafrique: Blaise Compaoré (I did not understand: if Iran develops a relationship with puppet of imperialism, where is the resistance?) . But most
important is the recent establishment of a regional sphere of influence.
follows a long discussion of the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic, which I'll spare you, and marvel that ends with this little phrase:
Iran is organizing a neighborhood regional trust and cooperation, aiming to become a new pole of the multipolar world emerging before our eyes.
seems written by the press office of any Iranian embassy. What Iran is not qualified with a term expansionist imperialism. The Islamic Republic supports the foreign occupation in Afghanistan, massacre, through its quisling, opponents of the government in Baghdad, waving his club in the sectarian conflict in Yemen, Bahrain, Qatar and Pakistan. What can I say? Perhaps the only possible comment about the extraordinary ability to persuade Tehran to be a bastion of resistance to the U.S., while working with them on all fronts (such as Yugoslavia, when he did get loads of weapons to Muslim separatists of Izetbegovic) or the incredible carelessness of so many "alternative" if the Europeans and Americans who are drinking. For the post will judge.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)