NON PROVO ALTRO CHE FELICITà.
lived Revolution people Arab !
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Monday, January 24, 2011
Do You Have To Extend Outlets After Tiling
sentimental glances in the brains of journalists
The facts of these days suggest many reflections. I say this because strange things happen, or rather things that may seem strange until you get hold of the logic that governs them. In these lines I will try to single out this logic.
To do this I focus on what can rightly be considered the week's events: the continuation of the protests in Tunisia, directed now against the provisional government of Fouad Mebazaâ, and the "discovery" that revolves around a large number of Berlusconi ... girls.
That now I would not have the facts in themselves, but their treatment by the media imperialists. I use this term also well obsolete for defining a precise category, of communication in the hands of large companies in each country, the local economic powers. These companies (primarily newspapers) have a tendency, for years, to look more like each other, to constitute an indistinguishable, or rather a swarm of media agencies that moves with straordianria compactness. Republic ripende the articles in the New York Times survey taken from El Pais, while the Courier published an editorial signed by a journalist of Le Monde that talks about the latest revelations of independence. This phenomenon is not mysterious is explained by recalling that the owners of these titles belong to the same class, they often attended the same schools are able to speak the same language and have the very same interests in the financial, economic and even geopolitical. Nothing strange, then.
These large publishers who dominate the world of communication from both sides of the Atlantic, hate Berlusconi. I hate how they hated Craxi (as he sharply noticed the time), and almost for the same reasons, and as against Craxi, trying to hurl it down from the bench with subversive methods. L 'affaire Ruby, like the previous D'Addario and Naomi, are resolved in these simple considerations.
brackets. From what is written may seem that I support the thesis of the coup of the judges 'red', exactly as representatives of the PDL, the script even copiassi Cicchitto. Error: I am convinced that something akin to a coup "painless" bark removed the crack of the AFC in '92-93, and you try to repeat today with Berlusconi, but I do not think the perpetrators of plot are the judges, anything, are journalists.
are no investigations to bring down governments, not the PM to upset the political coup with ulterior motives: is the media, with their unique ability to create "noise" and unleash a lot of noise to interfere with the democratic process. An indictment, and even an arrest, that does not raise the adequate publicity in the media, would not provide anything. Salvatore Cuffaro Remember? During the trial for aiding and abetting aggravated the President of Sicily had been the subject of a veritable crusade of Legality. Well, yesterday the topic was locked up in national prisons. The news is a back seat. Or is Steno Marcegaglia Antonio is known magnates of steel, have both been convicted in different circumstances, for corruption. This has perhaps prevented Emma Marcegaglia to become president of Confindustria? Not at all: the judges have exercised without discount the prosecution, but it's not the media pillory. Understand who does the coup? digression.
In these days of rage anti-Berlusconi, sent press TV and around Italy to find someone (a few) that would reveal the gory details on the exuberance of Berlusconi, will be the most overlooked one detail, the meeting between our Prime Minister and that of Somalia. In the unfortunate African country, just as strategic, the civil war between the nationalist and anti-imperialist force (here in the form of political Islam) and committed the colonial system has reached a compromise with the formation of a coalition government : his meeting with Berlusconi wanted to clarify on which side is our country. Obviously, to be the wrong one.
This was news. You want to nail the head of government to its terrible responsibility? He speaks of his support for rapists of Somalia, a country transformed by the entire Western interests in a battlefield and in a dump. is sketched on issues such as a serious advertising campaign, and see if the Italians are really so in love Elder Monza!
But the media imperialists can not do anything like that. policy followed by Italy in Somalia, just to be the case, is dictated by NATO. How do the newspapers De Benedetti or Fiat Berlusconi could attack with real issues, like his scandalous complicity in the occupation of Afghanistan or to blackmail by Mirafiori and Pomigliano, when that occupation, and those blackmail, were called for, defended and pleaded precisely those papers? We live in the paradoxical situation in which a man from countless drawbacks as our prime minister is criticized for its only very few positives. In this the ultimate has reached the refined Bersani, when he publicly expressed concern that "after Berlusconi is a Chavez." Got it? The problem with Berlusconi, are his points in common with Chavez. So just because there is the siege of the media imperialists.
brings us to Tunisia. Here, too, do not talk about what happened in itself, but its treatment of media, subject to considerable discussion that surprises.
Ben Ali was indeed a dictator, a man "put there" back in '87 the French secret service and Italians (who have shown ingratitude sum denying asylum in need), an authoritative representative of the decline of Arab socialism to outside the borders of Iraq (where there never was any lapse, and we had to destroy a military invasion). Curiously vicissitutidini fate has superimposed the two presidents, Ben Ali, and Berlusconi, both debtors of their fortunes alo same character, Craxi.
I said that the Tunisian president was indeed a dictator, a dictator but a friend of the West. In theory, the guardians and masters of the West, the oligarchs that own the means of mass communication, they should defend their man, exasperated and defame the masses by giving them a negative connotation as much as possible in the public eye that counts, that is white and Christian.
media imperialists have not done so, and, in solidarity with the governments of respective countries, "let go" ( to drop down), happened in his time as the tyrant of Iran, Reza Pahlavi, the Arab tyrant, but went further. They have created a climate of solidarity and sympathy with the rioters, and found a nice name to the revolution (now "jasmine"). About the Republic of flipping through a few days ago, would be a beautiful map of despotic regimes in North Africa, indicating that seemed a hope, that the germ of revolt could infect the masses around the battered Arab world.
Now this appeal to overthrow the dictator is fully understandable in the logic that drives the imperialist media, with regard to Libya's Gaddafi, but Mubarak's Egypt? The old scavengers has transformed his country into a real outpost of the West, and guarantee Israel's security. Coem can hope to fall swept away by a popular uprising?
Avanzo a hypothesis. The 'habitus mental average journalist coomunicazione occidentai agency was formed, roughly, in the '80s. The end of that decade and the beginning of the following are the historical moment of the anti-Communist riots (Solidarnosc in Poland, the fall of the Berlin Wall, the end of the Soviet regime in Ethiopia and Yemen, falling Ceusescu in Romania, attempted insurrection in Beijing , Yeltsin dismissed the coup, etc). From the standpoint of our friend who works in the imperialist media, the popular uprising of the fuoi the borders of the West is democratic by definition. And so, for the conditioned reflex, you end up putting in a good light, putting them in the same pot, not just the "color revolutions" clear and widespread. like the one in Serbia in 2000, Georgia in 2003, Ukraine in 2004, in Lebanon in 2005 and so on, but also events, events that have no link between them, as the demonstrations in Tehran in 2009, in Bangkok than in the same year to the sedition act in these days in Tirana.
The Tunisian case falls into this category: the reporter saw a popular uprising in a country-western, whose government is by definition undemocratic. The cultural attitude of the educated and semi-educated class in Europe and the USA states that, outside the West, land of freedom, democratic governments do not exist: only the dictatorships of beasts: when the popular exasperation arises end to the power of these brutes, even if they were brutes exposures guardians of neo-colonial Western media fail to properly take the guidelines of geopolitics and go convenience to beat in solidarity with the rioters.
This approach, I would call almost instinctive, is the reflection of another belief, that the metaphysical: if governments outside the West are anti-democratic, those of Western countries are democratic forces, so that those who disputes without respecting them, not even tell you the law but the etiquette is necessarily a madman or an extremist. As I pointed out talking about the events of December 14 in Rome, violent protests, the protests true are not accepted within the imperial metropolis, and what is heroic in Tunis is a scandal in Milan. Logically, this rule also applies to emanzioni Western governments-for-power Democrats, such as peacekeeping troops in , so who dares to fight with the negligible order to liberate their homeland is a horrible terrorist . We therefore
the paradox: when the Iraqi resistance, standard bearer of freedom and dignity of Arab attacks the institutions of the occupant of his collaborators, he commits crimes are unacceptable, deserving of tremendous punishment, and when the Egyptian people, eager to that freedom and that dignity, take to the streets to win, all the applause of those who have so far condemned them to poverty and oppression. 
The facts of these days suggest many reflections. I say this because strange things happen, or rather things that may seem strange until you get hold of the logic that governs them. In these lines I will try to single out this logic.
To do this I focus on what can rightly be considered the week's events: the continuation of the protests in Tunisia, directed now against the provisional government of Fouad Mebazaâ, and the "discovery" that revolves around a large number of Berlusconi ... girls.
That now I would not have the facts in themselves, but their treatment by the media imperialists. I use this term also well obsolete for defining a precise category, of communication in the hands of large companies in each country, the local economic powers. These companies (primarily newspapers) have a tendency, for years, to look more like each other, to constitute an indistinguishable, or rather a swarm of media agencies that moves with straordianria compactness. Republic ripende the articles in the New York Times survey taken from El Pais, while the Courier published an editorial signed by a journalist of Le Monde that talks about the latest revelations of independence. This phenomenon is not mysterious is explained by recalling that the owners of these titles belong to the same class, they often attended the same schools are able to speak the same language and have the very same interests in the financial, economic and even geopolitical. Nothing strange, then.
These large publishers who dominate the world of communication from both sides of the Atlantic, hate Berlusconi. I hate how they hated Craxi (as he sharply noticed the time), and almost for the same reasons, and as against Craxi, trying to hurl it down from the bench with subversive methods. L 'affaire Ruby, like the previous D'Addario and Naomi, are resolved in these simple considerations.
brackets. From what is written may seem that I support the thesis of the coup of the judges 'red', exactly as representatives of the PDL, the script even copiassi Cicchitto. Error: I am convinced that something akin to a coup "painless" bark removed the crack of the AFC in '92-93, and you try to repeat today with Berlusconi, but I do not think the perpetrators of plot are the judges, anything, are journalists.
are no investigations to bring down governments, not the PM to upset the political coup with ulterior motives: is the media, with their unique ability to create "noise" and unleash a lot of noise to interfere with the democratic process. An indictment, and even an arrest, that does not raise the adequate publicity in the media, would not provide anything. Salvatore Cuffaro Remember? During the trial for aiding and abetting aggravated the President of Sicily had been the subject of a veritable crusade of Legality. Well, yesterday the topic was locked up in national prisons. The news is a back seat. Or is Steno Marcegaglia Antonio is known magnates of steel, have both been convicted in different circumstances, for corruption. This has perhaps prevented Emma Marcegaglia to become president of Confindustria? Not at all: the judges have exercised without discount the prosecution, but it's not the media pillory. Understand who does the coup? digression.
In these days of rage anti-Berlusconi, sent press TV and around Italy to find someone (a few) that would reveal the gory details on the exuberance of Berlusconi, will be the most overlooked one detail, the meeting between our Prime Minister and that of Somalia. In the unfortunate African country, just as strategic, the civil war between the nationalist and anti-imperialist force (here in the form of political Islam) and committed the colonial system has reached a compromise with the formation of a coalition government : his meeting with Berlusconi wanted to clarify on which side is our country. Obviously, to be the wrong one.
This was news. You want to nail the head of government to its terrible responsibility? He speaks of his support for rapists of Somalia, a country transformed by the entire Western interests in a battlefield and in a dump. is sketched on issues such as a serious advertising campaign, and see if the Italians are really so in love Elder Monza!
But the media imperialists can not do anything like that. policy followed by Italy in Somalia, just to be the case, is dictated by NATO. How do the newspapers De Benedetti or Fiat Berlusconi could attack with real issues, like his scandalous complicity in the occupation of Afghanistan or to blackmail by Mirafiori and Pomigliano, when that occupation, and those blackmail, were called for, defended and pleaded precisely those papers? We live in the paradoxical situation in which a man from countless drawbacks as our prime minister is criticized for its only very few positives. In this the ultimate has reached the refined Bersani, when he publicly expressed concern that "after Berlusconi is a Chavez." Got it? The problem with Berlusconi, are his points in common with Chavez. So just because there is the siege of the media imperialists.
brings us to Tunisia. Here, too, do not talk about what happened in itself, but its treatment of media, subject to considerable discussion that surprises.
Ben Ali was indeed a dictator, a man "put there" back in '87 the French secret service and Italians (who have shown ingratitude sum denying asylum in need), an authoritative representative of the decline of Arab socialism to outside the borders of Iraq (where there never was any lapse, and we had to destroy a military invasion). Curiously vicissitutidini fate has superimposed the two presidents, Ben Ali, and Berlusconi, both debtors of their fortunes alo same character, Craxi.
I said that the Tunisian president was indeed a dictator, a dictator but a friend of the West. In theory, the guardians and masters of the West, the oligarchs that own the means of mass communication, they should defend their man, exasperated and defame the masses by giving them a negative connotation as much as possible in the public eye that counts, that is white and Christian.
media imperialists have not done so, and, in solidarity with the governments of respective countries, "let go" ( to drop down), happened in his time as the tyrant of Iran, Reza Pahlavi, the Arab tyrant, but went further. They have created a climate of solidarity and sympathy with the rioters, and found a nice name to the revolution (now "jasmine"). About the Republic of flipping through a few days ago, would be a beautiful map of despotic regimes in North Africa, indicating that seemed a hope, that the germ of revolt could infect the masses around the battered Arab world.
Now this appeal to overthrow the dictator is fully understandable in the logic that drives the imperialist media, with regard to Libya's Gaddafi, but Mubarak's Egypt? The old scavengers has transformed his country into a real outpost of the West, and guarantee Israel's security. Coem can hope to fall swept away by a popular uprising?
Avanzo a hypothesis. The 'habitus mental average journalist coomunicazione occidentai agency was formed, roughly, in the '80s. The end of that decade and the beginning of the following are the historical moment of the anti-Communist riots (Solidarnosc in Poland, the fall of the Berlin Wall, the end of the Soviet regime in Ethiopia and Yemen, falling Ceusescu in Romania, attempted insurrection in Beijing , Yeltsin dismissed the coup, etc). From the standpoint of our friend who works in the imperialist media, the popular uprising of the fuoi the borders of the West is democratic by definition. And so, for the conditioned reflex, you end up putting in a good light, putting them in the same pot, not just the "color revolutions" clear and widespread. like the one in Serbia in 2000, Georgia in 2003, Ukraine in 2004, in Lebanon in 2005 and so on, but also events, events that have no link between them, as the demonstrations in Tehran in 2009, in Bangkok than in the same year to the sedition act in these days in Tirana.
The Tunisian case falls into this category: the reporter saw a popular uprising in a country-western, whose government is by definition undemocratic. The cultural attitude of the educated and semi-educated class in Europe and the USA states that, outside the West, land of freedom, democratic governments do not exist: only the dictatorships of beasts: when the popular exasperation arises end to the power of these brutes, even if they were brutes exposures guardians of neo-colonial Western media fail to properly take the guidelines of geopolitics and go convenience to beat in solidarity with the rioters.
This approach, I would call almost instinctive, is the reflection of another belief, that the metaphysical: if governments outside the West are anti-democratic, those of Western countries are democratic forces, so that those who disputes without respecting them, not even tell you the law but the etiquette is necessarily a madman or an extremist. As I pointed out talking about the events of December 14 in Rome, violent protests, the protests true are not accepted within the imperial metropolis, and what is heroic in Tunis is a scandal in Milan. Logically, this rule also applies to emanzioni Western governments-for-power Democrats, such as peacekeeping troops in , so who dares to fight with the negligible order to liberate their homeland is a horrible terrorist . We therefore
the paradox: when the Iraqi resistance, standard bearer of freedom and dignity of Arab attacks the institutions of the occupant of his collaborators, he commits crimes are unacceptable, deserving of tremendous punishment, and when the Egyptian people, eager to that freedom and that dignity, take to the streets to win, all the applause of those who have so far condemned them to poverty and oppression.
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Watch Megaman Stream Sub
Chicche
Genius sentence of that found on Fabbietto Comedonchisciotte:
the only shame in Piazzale Loreto is the fact that it happened with twenty years late.
Invite Wording Not Paying For Meal
Unions fierce
In those days I had the flu. As a result I spent a long time (too much) on my sofa, watching many (too many) hours of good TV.
Apart from the documentary on the Congo or the beetles wonderful an offer of Italy, my attention fell on dibbattiti where they talked to Fiat, the genius of Markionne and workers to do in pieces. I take this opportunity to congratulate the members of the powerful Fiom, with special mention for the fireworks Cremaschi, to be always able to keep up with the enemy (although a limit, roughly, I have had: not to inform the people of ' Alternatively ).
brackets.
Did you see the duel last Sunday at Landini-Bombassei in half an hour, the program Lucia Annunziata? Who has seen him has understood definitively because the bosses do not like to deal with the representatives of employees. Trade unionists, generally, make a career based on their temper. Skimming and subjected to a merciless selection, they become machines assault. The heads of employers' associations
however, are chosen with the same criteria with which they are appointed honorary president of the IPP and the Golf Club.
the obvious result is that while the union when he speaks relaxed, seems to challenge a mace, the industry seems to just come out of a cocktail party. All this to say that I felt sorry for Bombassei here.
digression.
I come to the point. On the various television networks, patrolled by my sick eyes, presence, in addition to trade union leaders, representatives from FIM-CISL, the Uilm, of Fismic, as well as UGL and ACQ.
They were divided into two categories. There was a minority that appeared more or less desperate and submissive, to that in tune with their constituents, and made himself understood with his eyes before the Word, who really felt with their backs to the wall, and only this led them to say yes to the referendum vote-halter. This
minority. But then there was the most terrible . A host of trade unionists fierce eye, mostly in suits, which could be seen, rejoiced for what was happening. I have the flu, high fever, but I'm not delusional. So take a tone of voice, and their voices were veined by a very clear feeling: satisfaction.
The idea that an MSW is passed to an RSA made up, in open defiance of the law 300/1970, filled them with childlike joy. The prospect of eliminating the red sollucchera them from your field of vision. Waiting for this moment, here's the truth. The steering Markionnica has the merit of having done what emerge from time traveling submerged:
resentment against the Fiom.
These unions are the most radical of the property FIAT in managing the final burial of the dignity of workers in our country. Do you remember the industrial cocktail party? How would protect your filthy comfortable without gangs of thugs (for hours media-metaphorical)?
Is there a foolproof way to distinguish the minority from the majority whiners bastards. Simply identify the key phrase: times have changed.
Times have changed. So goes the world today, my lady . What does it do? is modernity.
Times have changed. When a union leader speaks as a PhD student at Bocconi University, it is time to prepare for the worst.
I remember thinking "they hate us." This hatred, the deep roots and the potential, I fear, yet unspoken, in my opinion is a reflection of the dominant culture. It is based on contempt of itself by of the employed, whose class is always the extraction of the union, although yellow or brown. The contempt of self is the fundamental component of our times, times where there is no more dichotomy bourgeoisie / proletariat, but the far more puzzling dichotomy losers / winners. And there is the slightest doubt that, for our culture, the worker is a loser. 
In those days I had the flu. As a result I spent a long time (too much) on my sofa, watching many (too many) hours of good TV.
Apart from the documentary on the Congo or the beetles wonderful an offer of Italy, my attention fell on dibbattiti where they talked to Fiat, the genius of Markionne and workers to do in pieces. I take this opportunity to congratulate the members of the powerful Fiom, with special mention for the fireworks Cremaschi, to be always able to keep up with the enemy (although a limit, roughly, I have had: not to inform the people of ' Alternatively ).
brackets.
Did you see the duel last Sunday at Landini-Bombassei in half an hour, the program Lucia Annunziata? Who has seen him has understood definitively because the bosses do not like to deal with the representatives of employees. Trade unionists, generally, make a career based on their temper. Skimming and subjected to a merciless selection, they become machines assault. The heads of employers' associations
however, are chosen with the same criteria with which they are appointed honorary president of the IPP and the Golf Club.
the obvious result is that while the union when he speaks relaxed, seems to challenge a mace, the industry seems to just come out of a cocktail party. All this to say that I felt sorry for Bombassei here.
digression.
I come to the point. On the various television networks, patrolled by my sick eyes, presence, in addition to trade union leaders, representatives from FIM-CISL, the Uilm, of Fismic, as well as UGL and ACQ.
They were divided into two categories. There was a minority that appeared more or less desperate and submissive, to that in tune with their constituents, and made himself understood with his eyes before the Word, who really felt with their backs to the wall, and only this led them to say yes to the referendum vote-halter. This
minority. But then there was the most terrible . A host of trade unionists fierce eye, mostly in suits, which could be seen, rejoiced for what was happening. I have the flu, high fever, but I'm not delusional. So take a tone of voice, and their voices were veined by a very clear feeling: satisfaction.
The idea that an MSW is passed to an RSA made up, in open defiance of the law 300/1970, filled them with childlike joy. The prospect of eliminating the red sollucchera them from your field of vision. Waiting for this moment, here's the truth. The steering Markionnica has the merit of having done what emerge from time traveling submerged:
resentment against the Fiom.
These unions are the most radical of the property FIAT in managing the final burial of the dignity of workers in our country. Do you remember the industrial cocktail party? How would protect your filthy comfortable without gangs of thugs (for hours media-metaphorical)?
Is there a foolproof way to distinguish the minority from the majority whiners bastards. Simply identify the key phrase: times have changed.
Times have changed. So goes the world today, my lady . What does it do? is modernity.
Times have changed. When a union leader speaks as a PhD student at Bocconi University, it is time to prepare for the worst.
I remember thinking "they hate us." This hatred, the deep roots and the potential, I fear, yet unspoken, in my opinion is a reflection of the dominant culture. It is based on contempt of itself by of the employed, whose class is always the extraction of the union, although yellow or brown. The contempt of self is the fundamental component of our times, times where there is no more dichotomy bourgeoisie / proletariat, but the far more puzzling dichotomy losers / winners. And there is the slightest doubt that, for our culture, the worker is a loser.
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Expressgate Installation
point of view of Mazzini on the agreement of Mirafiori
Today, the "capital" - and this is the current economic ills of society - is the despot of work. Of the three classes form today, economically, the company - "capitalists", ie owners of the means or instruments of labor, land, farms, cash, commodities - entrepreneurs, labor leaders, businessmen, who represent or should represent the intellect - and workers who are manual work - the first, alone, is the master of the field, mistress to promote, delay, speed, heading towards certain ends of work. And its share in the profits of labor, production value, is comparatively determined: the location of the instruments of labor does not change if not between known limits and restricted, and the time, up to a certain extent at least, is his, not at the mercy of the absolute need. The second part is uncertain, dependent on their intellect, their activities, but in particular circumstances, more or less by the development of competition and the flow back or retreat, as a result of events not calculated, the capital. The
of the past, the "workers" is the "wages" determined "prior" to the job and without regard to the profits that come out more or less' business, and the limits between which the salary if I estimated, are determined by the relationship that exists between the work and offered the job, in other words, between the "population" of the workers and the "capital". Now the first tending to the increase and an increase that exceeds generally, if only slightly, the increase in the second, the wage tents, where other causes not interpose themselves, to fall. And time is in the hands of the worker: the financial or political crisis, the sudden introduction of new machinery to the different branches of industry, the irregularities in the production and its excessive accumulation in one direction often inseparable from a little Floodlit competition, the unequal division of the population of workers on certain points or certain business lines, and ten other causes interrupting the work, do not leave the worker's free choice of its terms. On one hand the absolute misery for him, the other the acceptance of any agreement that is being proposed. 
Today, the "capital" - and this is the current economic ills of society - is the despot of work. Of the three classes form today, economically, the company - "capitalists", ie owners of the means or instruments of labor, land, farms, cash, commodities - entrepreneurs, labor leaders, businessmen, who represent or should represent the intellect - and workers who are manual work - the first, alone, is the master of the field, mistress to promote, delay, speed, heading towards certain ends of work. And its share in the profits of labor, production value, is comparatively determined: the location of the instruments of labor does not change if not between known limits and restricted, and the time, up to a certain extent at least, is his, not at the mercy of the absolute need. The second part is uncertain, dependent on their intellect, their activities, but in particular circumstances, more or less by the development of competition and the flow back or retreat, as a result of events not calculated, the capital. The
of the past, the "workers" is the "wages" determined "prior" to the job and without regard to the profits that come out more or less' business, and the limits between which the salary if I estimated, are determined by the relationship that exists between the work and offered the job, in other words, between the "population" of the workers and the "capital". Now the first tending to the increase and an increase that exceeds generally, if only slightly, the increase in the second, the wage tents, where other causes not interpose themselves, to fall. And time is in the hands of the worker: the financial or political crisis, the sudden introduction of new machinery to the different branches of industry, the irregularities in the production and its excessive accumulation in one direction often inseparable from a little Floodlit competition, the unequal division of the population of workers on certain points or certain business lines, and ten other causes interrupting the work, do not leave the worker's free choice of its terms. On one hand the absolute misery for him, the other the acceptance of any agreement that is being proposed.
What Do Digimon Toys Look Like
My point of view on the assassination Egyptian
sorry for the long absence.
I borrow from the blog haramlik this beautiful picture:
and making something of my own. Unfortunately, to include a minimum you should be aware of things to Iraqis, as well as residents in Genoa. But it is never too late to improve.
sorry for the long absence.
I borrow from the blog haramlik this beautiful picture:
and making something of my own. Unfortunately, to include a minimum you should be aware of things to Iraqis, as well as residents in Genoa. But it is never too late to improve.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)